The Truth About Alex Pretti Minnesota Shooting
What’s being framed as a Pro-ICE vs Anti-ICE debate is actually something else entirely: a fight using guns as a proxy. And that’s where the lies start — on both sides.
This video breaks the incident down strictly from a Second Amendment perspective, not partisan loyalty, not vibes, not tribal politics.
We address:
• Why simply carrying a firearm does not make someone a criminal
• What Minnesota law actually says about carrying at protests
• Why “it wasn’t smart” and “it wasn’t legal” are not the same thing
• The uncomfortable reality of anti-gun rhetoric — even from people we’ve defended
• Why actions matter more than soundbites when judging politicians
• The real legal standard for deadly force under the Fourth Amendment
• How negligent discharges change everything
• And why a gun existing is not the same thing as a gun being a threat
This isn’t about liking the protest.
This isn’t about liking ICE.
This isn’t about defending stupidity.
It’s about constitutional consistency.
If your belief in the Second Amendment disappears the moment the person carrying a gun isn’t “on your team,” then you don’t actually believe in the Second Amendment.
And if a negligent discharge happened — and shots followed anyway — that matters. Legally. Constitutionally. Morally.
Comments
Post a Comment